from the discussions dept
This week, our first put winner on the insightful aspect is a basic anonymous comment about the attacks on libraries from massive publishers:
It’s depressing to know libraries could not exist if they ended up invented nowadays mainly because of greedy publishers.
In second area, it is Strawb responding to a commenter complaining about our praise of Vijaya Gadde:
Just simply because you disagree with their moderation decisions does not necessarily mean that it’s untrue, Koby.
For editor’s decision on the insightful side, we have bought two opinions about Netflix’s password sharing crackdown, which is coming to the US. To start with, it’s glenn with a simple demand from customers:
Ok, then… I want a refund on these 3 streams that I didn’t use at all this thirty day period.
Future, it’s Thad with a perennial reply to this form of point:
Pirates, as usually, are unaffected.
Above on the amusing aspect, our 1st place winner is Keven P. Neal with a remark about Republicans suing Google to consider to drive it to prevent filtering their spam:
Irreparable damage?
Google “irreparably injured the RNC’s romantic relationship with its community.”
Genuinely? “I’m never ever heading to vote Republican all over again! I never received an email asking for funds!” — mentioned no person ever.
In second put, it’s That 1 Dude having sarcastic about the issues Elon Musk will experience as the proprietor of Twitter:
I suggest everything I have browse about him implies that he’s a humble individual ready to acknowledge when he’s incorrect/in around his head and permit others with much more expertise step in and protect for his failings, so I’m certain he’ll be ready to stay clear of the challenge somewhat than stand his floor even as Twitter burns down around him owing to an avalanche of Really Fine People today getting specified absolutely free reign there.
For editor’s option on the humorous aspect, we get started out with 1 extra comment from That One Man, this time highlighting the dissonance involving Clearview AI’s internet marketing and its defense versus EU privacy laws:
Clearview: Our services is an outstanding tool for determining individuals by matching their faces to facts like site and title.
Also Clearview: We have no concept who the people in our databases are and no way to even guess in which they could possibly reside.
Last but not least, it is Thad again with a comment about Donald Trump telling the Supreme Court that social media is a popular carrier, with out at any time mentioning his very own social community:
Possibly he just forgot about Reality Social. Like everyone else.
That is all for this 7 days, individuals!
